• Opleidingen
  • Summercourse
  • E-learnings
  • Incompany
    • Incompany gemeenten
  • Docenten
    • Blogs
  • Nieuws
  • Specialisten
  • Dossiers
  • Vacatures
    • Kantoren
    • Carrière
  • Over ons
  • Contact
  • Adverteren
  • Nieuwsbrief
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • Spring naar de hoofdnavigatie
  • Door naar de hoofd inhoud
  • Spring naar de eerste sidebar
  • Spring naar de voettekst
  • Over ons
  • Contact
  • Adverteren
  • Nieuwsbrief
Fiscaal Vanmorgen

  • Opleidingen
  • Summercourse
  • E-learnings
  • Incompany
    • Incompany gemeenten
  • Docenten
    • Blogs
  • Nieuws
  • Specialisten
  • Dossiers
  • Vacatures
    • Kantoren
    • Carrière
Home » Dossiers » Corona measures: potential cross border tax and social security consequences of working at home

Corona measures: potential cross border tax and social security consequences of working at home

30%-regeling

Hopefully, the Corona measures that the Netherlands and the rest of the world are taking will be effective enough to also deal with the financial consequences of this pandemic. Some of these measures do not directly relate to tax, but they do have immediate tax and social security consequences. Even though this might not be your first point of concern, it is important to keep this in mind.

20 maart 2020
Start consult aanvraag

One of the measures taken is that individuals are encouraged (and in some countries obliged) to work from their homes. Because of these measures, a vast number of employees that usually works cross-border has shifted their place of work to their homes. Working from home in the home country instead of travelling, or working in the host country, may also alter the tax and social security situation. Below, we outline the most important tax and social security consequences that employers and their cross border workers may face when they work from home.

Tax consequences & 30%-ruling

When cross border workers work from home in the Netherlands, they may end up with a higher Dutch and a lower host country income tax liability. In general, and under certain conditions, the salary relating to these home workdays is taxable in the Netherlands. The salary relating to the work days spent at the office in the host country, is taxable in the host country. Conversely, cross border workers that are non-Dutch tax residents may end up with a lower Dutch and a higher home country income tax liability.

Non-Dutch tax residents with the 30%-ruling who have to work from home in their home country might also lose a part of the 30%-ruling benefit as it can only be applied on employment income that is taxable in the Netherlands.

The 183-days rule also plays a role. Meeting or not meeting the 183-days rule – contrary to what is anticipated – will affect the overall tax liability.

Finally, employers may face payroll/wage tax withholding requirements in the countries where the employees are now performing their work.

All in all, the overall tax liability might change significantly, for both employers and employees with various advantageous, but also disadvantageous consequences.

Social security consequences

Working from home may also have consequences for the social security position of cross border workers. Based on EU social security legislation, an individual is in principle socially insured in the country where he or she actually works. However, if the individual pursues a substantial part of the activities (i.e. at least 25%) in the home country, he might become socially insured in the home country. The social security position of cross border workers that are socially insured in the host country may change when they work at least 25% of their time in the home country, depending on the expectations for the coming 12 months. This change may then lead to social security implications and obligations for both employers and employees/self-employed persons. 

Permanent establishment

The definition of a permanent establishment (PE) is very broad and entails a fixed place of business through which the business of a company is (partly) carried on. In some situations, a home office could constitute a permanent establishment. This is in general only the case if the home office is used on a regular and continuous base for carrying on business activities and in the situation when it is clear that the company has required the individual to work from home. Without going much into detail, a PE may arise in the situation that individuals have to work from home for a longer period because of the measures taken. This can lead to unforeseen tax obligations for both employers and employees/self-employed persons.

Some counties across Europe are already negotiating about the potential impact and possible tax and social security solutions for home workers.  Although tax & social security planning might be difficult with all the travel limitations applicable, we advise you to at least monitor this carefully and discuss this with your advisor.

We will keep you updated. Please feel free to contact us for more information.

Gerelateerde dossiers

16 oktober 2020

Many employees will lose the 30%-ruling per the end of 2020.

25 februari 2020

The Court of Appeal: Living in the Netherlands for more than two years and still entitled to the 30%-ruling

10 november 2018

Newsflash 2019 Budget: a random ‘Act’ of unfairness: 30% ruling to be decreased to 5 years with a horrendous transition measure

19 oktober 2018

Newsflash 2019 Budget: 30% ruling to be decreased to 5 years: new transition measure for existing cases

Specialisten

Mohamed Kaddour LL.M RB
mr. Toon Hasselman
Hans Eijkelenkamp
Erik Marcus
Denny Vermeer
Sazas Adviseur Inkomen
Martijn Paping MSc
Olaf van Dijk
Frits Algie
mr. Xander Arends
Sazas WIA-experts
Daan Durlacher
Ruben Scherpenisse
Paul Lenos LL.M
Alex Schrijver
mr. Carola van Vilsteren
Jacqueline Nietveld
mr. Reinder de Jong
mr. Peter Bregman RB
mr. Michiel van der Pol
mr. drs. John Bult
drs. Pieter Visser RB
Arnaud Booij
mr. André van der Velde
Martijn Bedaux
drs. Volken Holtrop
mr. Sjoerd Bosma
mr. Nienke ten Donkelaar
mr. Khadija Bozia
mr. John Seerden
Jacques Raaijmakers
mr. Priscilla de Haas
Michiel Opgenoort
Kirsten Kievit LL.M
mr. Theo Hoogwout
Sazas Verzuimexperts
mr. Samad Laghmouchi LLM MBA
jan wietsma
Jan Wietsma
mr. Ralf Ramakers
Sazas Regresspecialist
Jos van Bavel
mr. Roel de Jong
Ron Mulder
mr. Heleen Elbert
Amanda Vollemans
prof. mr. Jeroen Rheinfeld
Marja van den Oetelaar
mr. Laura Welkers
Willem Veldhuizen RE RTAP
Erik Jansen
Léon de Jager
Nicole Goud
mr. Roelof Vos
Jeroen Bijl
Aimée van der Paardt
mr. drs. Wicher-Henk Krabbe

Fiscaal Vanmorgen (FV) is het platform voor belastingadviseurs, fiscalisten, accountants en iedereen die geïnteresseerd is in fiscale opleidingen en fiscaal nieuws.

Fiscaal Vanmorgen is een uitgave van MOCuitgevers Vanmorgen.

 

Categorie

  • Opleidingen
  • Summercourse
  • E-learnings
  • Incompany
    • Incompany gemeenten
  • Docenten
    • Blogs
  • Nieuws
  • Specialisten
  • Dossiers
  • Vacatures
    • Kantoren
    • Carrière

Info

  • Over ons
  • Contact
  • Algemene voorwaarden MOCuitgevers Vanmorgen
  • Annuleringsvoorwaarden
  • Privacybeleid
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
Cookies
Om u beter van dienst te kunnen zijn, maakt Fiscaal Vanmorgen gebruik van cookies.
  • Ik ga akkoord
  • Instellingen
  • Functionele cookies zijn noodzakelijk voor de werking van deze website
  • We gebruiken Google Analytics, netjes geanonimiseerd
  • Annuleren
  • Ik ga akkoord

Instellingen